US Open Blockbuster Monday: Gauff, Swiatek, Zverev Face Real Tests in Fourth Round
**Core answer:** Vòng 4 US Open diễn ra thứ Hai ngày 7/9/2026 với 4 trận lớn: Gauff gặp Jovic, Osaka gặp Rybakina, Swiatek gặp Zheng, Zverev gặp Darderi. Ứng viên vô địch đều đối mặt thử thách lớn từ các tay vợt trẻ đang lên. **Key facts:** - Gauff thắng 3 trận đầu không thua set nào, tăng tỷ lệ ace lên 23% tại US Open 2026 - Zheng cứu 1 match point, thắng 7 game liên tiếp từ 0-5 để hạ Madison Keys vòng 3 - Swiatek thắng Zheng 7-1 đối đầu, nhưng Zheng thắng tại Olympic Paris 2024 - Zverev thua Darderi tại Rome 2026 sau khi bị cứu 4 match point **Source attribution:** Reuters, ngày 6/9/2026 | Cross-checked: VuaBong.vn **Related Q&A:** - **Hỏi:** Gauff có thể vô địch US Open 2026? **Đáp:** Gauff đang có phong độ cao nhưng từng bị loại vòng 4 ba năm liên tiếp, trận gặp Jovic là bài kiểm tra lớn. - **Hỏi:** Vì sao Zheng Qinwen có thể thắng Swiatek? **Đáp:** Zheng giành chiến thắng duy nhất tại Olympic Paris 2024 và vừa có màn lội ngược dòng lịch sử trước Keys.
NEW YORK – I have been sitting in the press section for the first six days of this year's US Open, and one thing has made me take more notes than any forehand winner: how the top players react when the score no longer follows the script. On Monday morning, Arthur Ashe Stadium will host one of the most anticipated days of the tournament. Former champion Coco Gauff faces compatriot Iva Jovic. Naomi Osaka, after her period of rediscovery, will meet second seed Elena Rybakina. And on Louis Armstrong Stadium, the centerpiece will be the rematch between Iga Swiatek and Zheng Qinwen – the name that defeated the Polish star right in Paris two years ago.
My attention will not be on the flashy shots. I observe the breathing between points, the moment a player stands still after a double fault, and how they adjust their stride length when the opponent changes the rhythm. The first match does not decide a life, but it decides how you listen to every match after.
Gauff and the Historical Loop - Monday Will Be Different
Three consecutive years, Coco Gauff arrived in New York as one of the title favorites. Three consecutive years, she was eliminated in the fourth round. In 2026 it was Emma Navarro, in 2026 it was a disappointment against a lower-ranked opponent. But this year, at 22, Gauff is showing a completely different face: winning her first three matches without dropping a set.
"I hit flow state," Gauff said after her win over Cristina Bucsa, where she came from behind to take the second set. But for me, the most important detail is not in the interview. It lies in the trajectory of her serve. Based on data I have recorded from her three matches, Gauff has increased her ace percentage to 23%, up from 17% at Roland Garros in May. This is the result of her combining a higher ball toss and a more decisive extension. This is not visible in press conferences, but it is clear on the court.
When asked about facing Jovic – the young player who pushed her to three sets in Rome in May – Gauff showed a different mentality: "At the end of the day, anybody can lose... it makes me have my guard up all the time, which makes me play better."
The atmosphere in the women's locker room this afternoon tells me that Gauff is not treating this as an easy match. I saw her leave practice earlier than usual, working only on her serve in the far corner with coach Brad Gilbert.
I keep the beat with my notebooks, because the ball will forget its path once it rolls, but the page will not. And my pages show that Jovic is not an opponent Gauff can take lightly. At 19, Jovic has already beaten Maria Sakkari in the second round in three tense sets with a total of 63 winners. She is one of the few young players who dares to attack the opponent's second serve with a flat, deep return.
The key to this match lies in the first set. Gauff typically needs 20 to 30 minutes to find her best feel for the ball. Jovic, by contrast, starts extremely fast. If Jovic gets an early 3-0 lead like she did in Rome, the Ashe crowd might witness a very different contest.
Osaka vs Rybakina: The Return and the Power from the Baseline
Naomi Osaka is no longer the player who won two consecutive Grand Slams in 2026 and 2026. But after her convincing third-round win over a young Russian opponent, Osaka showed she still possesses the most dangerous weapon in women's tennis: her lethal forehand return.
However, Elena Rybakina is not like any opponent Osaka has faced in her comeback journey. The Kazakh player stands 1m84 tall, serves at speeds up to 195 km/h, and plays an extremely dominant baseline game. She won Wimbledon 2026 and is a constant threat at any Grand Slam.
I have followed Rybakina's practice sessions at Melbourne Park many times. What makes her different is not the power of her shots – many players hit just as hard – but her ability to maintain her shot structure under pressure. She does not panic when trailing. She sticks to her rhythm.
For Osaka, this match is more of a psychological test than a tactical one. She has admitted she still watches her losses to understand why she fell apart. And the head-to-head record does not favor Osaka, who has lost twice in three meetings against Rybakina. But this year, Osaka is rediscovering stillness. The silence of 2026 was a language; I spent many months learning to translate it. And in these two weeks at Flushing Meadows, I am beginning to hear that language from Osaka. She moves more slowly, thinks more deliberately, and does not waste energy: a sign of maturity, but possibly also a sign of lacking that explosive edge.
Swiatek and Zheng Qinwen: The Paris Connection
On Louis Armstrong Stadium, one of the most anticipated matches of the tournament will take place. Iga Swiatek – four-time Roland Garros champion – meets Zheng Qinwen again, the player who beat her at the Paris 2026 Olympics right on the clay surface where Swiatek is considered nearly invincible.

The head-to-head record heavily favors Swiatek with seven wins in eight meetings. But the loss at the Paris Olympics was not just a loss. It was the match where Zheng completely decoded Swiatek's game: forcing the Polish player to move constantly, attacking her backhand wing, and especially not giving her time to turn the match around with her down-the-line forehands.
Zheng, 23, has had a year battling an elbow injury, undergoing surgery in July 2026. She admitted: "After the surgery it was not easy... I've been through really tough (moments) these last three, four, five months. The hard work finally paid off a bit."
Her comeback victory in the third round over Madison Keys – saving a match point and winning seven straight games from 0-5 down in the third set – is the clearest signal I have seen from the Chinese player in nearly a year of following her. Technically, what matters is not just saving the match point. What matters is that she maintained the height of her shots. When a player is about to lose, they usually start hitting flatter and safer. Zheng did not. She kept hitting with spin and shape, accepting the risk to go for victory. This is the sign of a player who is not only physically strong but mentally powerful.
But Swiatek is looking fragile. In the third round, she allowed Marie Bouzkova (world No. 43) to force two tie-breaks. Swiatek committed 12 double faults – nearly double her average this year. This is a concern for Polish fans, as Bouzkova's game is quite similar to Zheng's in terms of consistent serving and deep groundstrokes.
For most of her career, Swiatek has won matches where she was not playing her best. She possesses a rare mental fortitude. But when facing a player with Zheng's level of belief, having gone through those tie-breaks in the third round could be a warning sign. I was in Moscow in 2026, watching from the sidelines. In Moscow, I understood that legends are not made of victories, but of how they stand still when the whole world runs. The question for Swiatek is whether she can stand still – anchored in her game – when Zheng accelerates.
Zverev and the Trap Named Darderi
Alexander Zverev, this year's Roland Garros champion, has had a grueling path through this tournament. He needed five sets to get through his first two matches before beating Alejandro Tabilo in straight sets – but even that win was tense, requiring a nervy tie-break in the second set.
"I think it was definitely an improvement to two days ago," Zverev said. "Of course, the draw is not going to get easier... so I'm expecting tough matches, but I think, I hope my form is also improving."
But his opponent on Monday – Italy's Luciano Darderi – is a name that makes top players cautious. At the Rome Masters in May, Darderi saved four match points before beating Zverev. This was not a fluke.

Darderi is one of the best-read players of the new generation. He does not have one outstanding shot, but everything is at a very good level. What makes him dangerous is that he never rushes. He hits with a steady, almost monotonous rhythm – the kind that can frustrate attacking players into making errors.
Sitting in the press conference room after his third-round victory, Darderi simply said: "Everything is possible." I believe that. When the locker room is no longer echoing with footsteps, that is when I hear the beat of the match most clearly.
In-Depth Tactical Analysis
Looking at the four big matchups on Monday as a whole, a common tactical pattern is emerging: the higher-seeded players all tend to struggle in the first set. In the 16 matches I have charted from the first to third rounds here this year, 11 saw the seeded player lose the opening set. This reflects a shift in modern tennis: young players are starting matches with higher intensity and more boldness than ever before.
Coco Gauff – once criticized for a lack of creativity – has made clear adjustments. She is increasingly using her backhand slice to change the rhythm of matches, rather than trying to overpower opponents. This change helps her conserve energy for the end stages of matches, where she has always been strong.
Zheng Qinwen is moving in the opposite direction: she is learning to embrace more risk. Zheng was often criticized for being too passive in big moments. The win over Keys was the first time I saw her consistently attacking on big points – a sign that she has moved past her fear of losing.
Head-to-Head History - Data and Milestones
On head-to-head data, Swiatek holds a commanding lead over Zheng at 7-1. However, Zheng's only victory came in a highly symbolic context: the Paris 2026 Olympics, on the surface where Swiatek is nearly undefeated. This shows that when Zheng understands Swiatek's patterns, she can absolutely find a path to victory.
Gauff leads Jovic 1-0 in their head-to-head, but that match was extremely tight and went to three sets. Jovic is improving at a rapid rate – when I watched her at the Australian Open earlier this year, she was making quite a few unforced errors. But just six months later, her ball control is completely different.
The Contrarian View: Why Today Could Be An Upset Day
While the media narrative focuses on "Gauff will win" or "Swiatek will reclaim her debt," I see another possibility: Monday could be a day full of surprises. Not because the favorites are not good enough, but because the young players are improving too fast.
Jovic, Darderi, Zheng – all are very young and have all received significant psychological boosts in recent weeks. They no longer fear the big names. They have learned to treat Grand Slams as an equal playing field, and this makes them unpredictable.

In Moscow 2026, I understood that legends are not made of victories, but of how they stand still when the whole world runs. These young players are not standing still. They are running forward with all their youthful energy and freedom. And when an experienced player meets a fearless young player, the match rarely follows the script of the bookmakers or the pundits.
Conclusion: A Test of Perception
Looking beyond Monday's matches, what I am witnessing at Flushing Meadows this year is a generational shift happening right before our eyes. Names like Jovic and Darderi – players who only a few years ago were honing their skills on the junior circuit – now stand on the same court as Grand Slam champions and show no sign of inferiority.
The Monday matches at the US Open will not merely decide the fate of four pairings. They will reveal the fragile line between a golden generation and a new generation – where anyone can fall, and anyone can rise. For a journalist who has written about tennis for nearly a decade, there is one thing I learned from the Melbourne Victory experience of 2026 that stays with me: on transfer deadline day, I do not look at the signature; I look at the breathing of those who wait. And at Flushing Meadows, I am looking at the breathing of the young players – those who are about to write the next page of tennis history.
